The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Non-admin closure. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Countered (talk) 13:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hermesmann_v._Seyer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has no sources, has biased language, doesn't appear to be a landmark case as it claims. Looking for better sources, or someone who is an expert on cases to decide whether this was a landmark case or not. If neither can be found then it should be deleted. Countered (talk) 12:50, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Kansas-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Because the article has reliable sources of the sort required to meet the notability guidelines, the topic is presumed to warrant an article. I see no reason for not having this particular article, for example I can't find an appropriate merge target. Thincat (talk) 22:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep at first glance, I see a good amount of sources and this is apparently a landmark case that would warrant such an article. If the article is put together in good faith (i.e. isn't a hoax and I just don't see that), we just need to edit the language some.--Paul McDonald (talk) 03:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow Keep per improvements and excellent work by User:Thincat. Apparently a WP:BEFORE failure, and WP:HEY applies. Cavarrone 05:51, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Snow Keep. Bondegezou (talk) 09:35, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as per the sources currently in the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 05:49, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.