The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Appalachian State University#Publications. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 17:11, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

History Matters[edit]

History Matters (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources (apart from a library catalog and a copy of text from the journal's own website on the UNC Dept. of History website). Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG. Randykitty (talk) 18:37, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, journal is one of the most popular undergraduate history journals in the United States, and is frequently mentioned in lists of notable undergraduate journals alongside Georgetown, Tufts, Yale, and Harvard University's respective undergraduate history journals. I used the library catalogue source to show that the journal is indexed in the ESBCOhost American History catalogue, I would've gone straight to ESBCOhosts journal index but there is a paywall. At the very least, the journal is notable for being one of the few and first journals focusing on the work of undergrads, in fact, UNC Chapel Hill consulted with the editorial board of History Matters, as well as other universities with undergrad journals when they were creating their own undergraduate journal of history. So at the very least, the journal is considered notable enough to be an authority on publish undergraduate works. As for independent sources, there are numerous university websites that mention the journal as a potential publishing source for undergraduate students. Jp16103 19:03, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, its just rubbish, delete it please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.229.62.200 (talk) 20:35, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Care to elaborate? Jp16103 21:30, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 21:11, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academic journals-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 21:11, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.