The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was heartbroken. Ƙɽɨɱρᶓȶ 03:24, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Homosexuality in Kingdom Hearts (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Article based entirely on Original Research. Also a fictional topic that has not received "significant coverage" from real sources Corpx 07:22, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - orphan article that seems to be Original Research. Guroadrunner 07:24, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Many games and anime have characters who are always put together by the fans as a couple, sometimes the pairings result in homosexual (yaoi/yuri) stuff. However, Wikipedia should not cover entries like this. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 07:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. article seems to be mainly OR. Onopearls 14:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nom. --Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles^Tally-ho! 15:20, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Original research, just like the others said. -Hit bull, win steak^(Moo!) 15:25, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete because items like "holding hands" meets the vague criteria for "homosexuality". The page doesn't seem to have any thing worth merging to other pages. NobutoraTakeda 16:17, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete, total original research. Not at all significant. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 16:45, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete... not that my opinion is needed here ;) OR through and through. EyeSerene^TALK 18:33, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• I opened this wondering what the heck I missed by not finishing Kingdom Hearts II... oh, it's just fanon and OR. Never mind! Delete Tony Fox (arf!) review? 20:28, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - No real references, original research, and would confuse somebody not familiar with the video game series. (Guyinblack25 21:42, 16 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]
• Delete while agreeing with all above. The article itself is fuzzy and lacks any real level of context. --Stormbay 22:37, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as poorly written/unwikified, OR, and mostly unsourced (except a fan site which is often a doubtful type of source)--JForget 22:40, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Sounds like a big joke to me. I may be wrong, but whoever wrote it must've done it just to get a laugh. Delete that sucker. Magicallydajesus 02:52, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.