The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:51, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Honglong Tech Company Ltd.

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company, article has no references, Google hits show up little in terms of reliable sources. Seems like corporate spam. CitizenNeutral (talk) 07:07, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article is a promo soapbox for an non-notable company. No reliable sources are found. --Cold Season (talk) 16:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No reliable sources to establish notability. -Zanhe (talk) 12:20, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.