The result was keep. Nomination concern appears to be addressed (non-admin closure) Monty845 19:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
no indication, either by sourcing, coordinates, or giving names in Chinese and/or Tibetan, that this village even exists. My searches of 西藏红星村 (the likely name), including variations, on both Baidu and Google Earth have produced no results. Sorry, Dr. Blofeld. HXL's Roundtable and Record 23:35, 15 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Nono HXL, sorry quite unnecesary, I certainly trust your judgement. In fact I had proposed to Xeno to actually delete most of the Tibetan village sub stubs aside from the townships as a lot of them are not verifiable on google maps. I am on on the fence about this particular village; we'd be better off starting the articles which do have google book hits. But if you could find some info on it then its worth a keep.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:37, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yuck the problem is Hongxing, Tibet is a place in central Tibet yet that sources says Gonggar County which is in Shannan, in the southeast.? There oculd be two or three of them including in Yunnan. Bing features it on the map but as it uses the geodata coordinates it is slightly off as you can see by my coordinates which zoom in directly on the settlement.♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:16, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]