The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 07:55, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hope Macaulay

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO. Some minor coverage but paid churnalism and x of y article. No coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV. scope_creep^Talk 21:59, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Perhaps some significance in her industry, but not necessarily global notability. — Infogapp1 (talk) 22:06, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Searched Google news and added articles from Vogue India, Russian Vogue & Vogue Italia showing global notability. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkoala (talk • contribs) 22:21, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Also checked other references. Don't see any paid churnalism articles. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkoala (talk • contribs) 22:42, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That is exact same article, 6 summer knitwear labels that Instagram is obsessed with right now� printed in different locations. There is no coverage. scope_creep^Talk 07:31, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Vogue recommendation published in its various global editions (indicating the designer is literally 'en Vogue'). References include features in 3 major Irish newspapers and a recommendation in Elle Magazine (second only to Vogue in international fashion magazines). How is this no coverage? And where is the paid for churnalism?

It is an X of Y article listing six different companies with a small paragraph devoted to the subject. The Irish paper are hyper-local and don't indicate WP:SIGCOV. They are churnalism. scope_creep^Talk 20:00, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

'6 of..' is a Vogue house style for recommending 'on trend' designers in the world's leading fashion magazine. The Belfast Telegraph, Irish News and Irish Times are national newspapers in Ireland - not hyper local. The Belfast Telegraph and Irish News are editorial features based on interviews with the subject - not a reproduced press release - these articles are not churnalism. Did another Google search and found additional references including global coverage in Vanity Fair Italia and Harpar's Bazaar Singapore. Have added these references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rkoala (talk • contribs) 22:13, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are mostly pictures taken from Instagram, with small paragraphs attached or passing mentions. There is nothing in-depth that indicate the subject is notable. All of them are X of Y type articles, e.g. 50 people to watch. Not the in-depth secondary sources that are needed to prove notability on a BLP article. scope_creep^Talk 13:39, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:20, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Seems notable due to number of press. There are additional news coming up in Google news about her. Expertwikiguy (talk) 19:49, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:14, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral This article is a stub and is short, and there is not much information. This person did start a company, and that may be notable, but I do not know if this needs to be on Wikipedia or not. I am neutral at this time. I may change later. --Guitarist28 (talk) 12:24, 14 July 2020 (UTC) Blocked sockpuppet. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:20, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (Talk) 00:29, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.