The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Big Dom 20:48, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hugh Wesley Robinson,II

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested WP:PRODBLP. Current sources do not indicate notability of the subject or are not independent. Gnews provides no information on the individual. Does not appear to comply with WP:BLP. I, Jethrobot ^{drop me a line} 21:54, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Wikipedia guidelines. The article fails good references and reads as a resume. SwisterTwister talk 22:06, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:44, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:45, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I don't see reliable sources that demonstrate notability per WP:BIO. I removed references to facebook and myspace. Article seems like an autobiography anyways. P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 02:39, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as spam. Wikipedia is not the place to post your resume. Edward321 (talk) 11:54, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - some of the claims are so outrageous and outlandish, as to be BLP violations. Bearian (talk) 18:56, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.