The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Reminder: Wikipedia is not censored and don't nominate something for deletion just because you don't like it. John Reaves (talk) 16:56, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hui Voine! (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Irrelevant and unnecessary, not to mention obscene. This phrase developed doesn't seem worthy to be an article on Wikipedia. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chiming and strolling in the rain (talk • contribs).

• delete no sources, probably non-notable--Sefringle 01:30, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This slogan is very well known. -- Esp rus2 20:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Notable. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Su37amelia (talk • contribs) 00:05, 7 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mailer Diablo 11:00, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Seems to have been a fairly non-notable event (judging by the references and the description). Besides, the information is already listed in the t.A.T.u. article, so I don't see why it needs its own article. -Panser Born- (talk) 01:33, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete It may be well known but it doesn't need to be an article of its own. --User:Renee Jaslene Natasha 13:34, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Delete It does not need a separate article, unless it can be shown that it has become used in other contexts. DGG 07:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge or Delete per nom excepting it's perceived obscenity. WP is not censored. Thewinchester ^(talk) 04:59, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep or Redirect to t.A.T.u - can anyone read the Russian language WP article? Seems as big of a deal as many of their songs, its a notable part of their act. Smmurphy^(Talk) 04:38, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.