- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 07:52, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Huijuan[edit]
- Huijuan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Same problems as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mengjie and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baoshan (given name). This is not an article about a given name – rather, it's a list of people with different given names, which happen to be transliterated the same way in pinyin. This combination of topics clearly does not meet GNG, and the article is not useful for navigation as discussed at the two AfDs linked above. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 02:36, 20 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bobherry Talk My Edits 03:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, not eligible for Soft Deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:03, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. This seems valuable as a disambiguation page, if there's real WP:SYNTH concerns, remove the sentence about the transliteration. —siroχo 08:03, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The point about disambiguation was discussed at the two previous AFDs that I linked in the nomination; the consensus was that pages like this (combining multiple Chinese given names) are not useful for navigation. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 01:59, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. The way these names are grouped together is non encyclopedic and serves no practical purpose. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 17:35, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.