The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 17:55, 28 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ikechukwu Ndefo[edit]

Ikechukwu Ndefo (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log  • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)Category:Articles for deletion templates

the reason why i want this article removed is because it gives out the wrong information about ikechukwu ndefo. Firstly he is not the CEO of maersk sealand and never have been. For confirmation please check the maersk sealand website and confirm if he has ever been listed as an employee or the CEO in the company. The information is totally false. Ikechukwu Ndefo has never aspired for the governor seat in Anambra state, Nigeria as stated in the article; once again this is false information which can be verified, This is why i want the information removed immediately Chichi beybuh (talk) 10:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: How do you know that all the information is false? Do you know him? If so, how? If it is false, why did you write it in this edit? Thanks!   — Jeff G.  ツ 23:50, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"REPLY" Yes i know him. He is my dad. And you can visit the Maersk Sealand website to see if he is the CEO. He is not! 86.164.228.60 (talk) 11:04, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:56, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:07, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7. All of the substantive edits to the article came from the author/deletion nominator. The article author has obviously realised that this article doesn't belong in Wikipedia, so is doing the right thing by asking for it to be deleted. Let's not punish that author for the initial mistake by dragging this process out. If for some reason this isn't speedily deleted then delete anyway as the two sources provided in the article are searchable via Google Books and the subject's name doesn't appear in them: [1] [2], and the searches linked in the nomination only find Wikipedia mirrors and social networking sites. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! Please delete this. FALSE INFORMATION!. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.175.128.138 (talk) 16:27, 25 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.