The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 17:46, 3 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Il Mio Bambino

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (books) requirement. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:29, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Let's delete it "books" soon!Devbasdev (talk) 09:10, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Stephen Spender said that writing a book of poetry and waiting for a response was like dropping a rose down a well and waiting for a splash. Without any judgment on the poet or poems, small press references and individual works in translation won't quite pass the bar. I'm not sure Prufrock and Other Observations would have gotten an article at proto-Wikipedia until 1929. Hithladaeus (talk) 13:54, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It exists, but that's about it. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NBOOK. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:00, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.