The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:18, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Immigration and crime in Germany (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have tried very hard to bring this article into line with NPOV but I see how that it is a hopeless struggle. As long as the article is present, certain editors will use it as an opportunity to peddle their view that crime in Germany is caused by immigration. Any historical facts that I've tried to introduce have been removed in favour of a long list of crimes committed by immigrants in recent years. As has been pointed out in the discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard#Immigration_and_crime_in_Germany, there is no real need for this additional article rather than just a subsection of Immigration to Germany or Crime in Germany. The very linking of the two in the article's title is synthesis, with the clear implication that there is a direct connection between immigration and crime. It has also been suggested that the topic is, in itself not notable because "the article ... used to establish notability of the topic, the Federal Situation Report on Crime in the Context of Immigration for years 2015 and 2016, is specifically about the immigration in 2015 and 2016, when the government allowed one million immigrants to arrive, not about earlier waves of immigration such as Turkish guest workers". I'm afraid I can see no way of avoiding this turning into another POV disaster except by deleting it so that we can at least keep all the questionable material in one place. Deb (talk) 15:52, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also this 1991 report from Munich University supports the long-term notability of the topic. AadaamS (talk) 08:02, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:20, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:20, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 22:20, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That paragraph was about German interwar racism, not about immigrants, so I removed it.E.M.Gregory (talk) 09:46, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry about my English, but I mean Forced labour under German rule. The crimes included consensual sex with German women (hanging), no bending toward German people, any protests caused by bad conditions. Xx236 (talk) 10:08, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Crime in Germany describes also criminality of immigrants. The two pages should be integrated.Xx236 (talk) 08:07, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Crime in Germany is an article in need of improvement, not least because it fails to even address the most salient aspect of the topic, which is that Germany has one of the lowest crime rates in the world. Nevertheless, it it should serve as an overall summary of the topic, not least because with almost 300 articles in Category:Crime in Germany we can hardly redirect everything form everything from Human trafficking in Germany, Rape in Germany, and Corruption in Germany to Crime in Germany, which is the logic of your proposal. What might make sense would be to redirect some of the material on organized crime in immigrant groups ("Russian mafia," "Albanian mafia," and so forth,) which feels like WP:UNDUE overemphasis on the page Crime in Germany to this page on "Immigration and crime in Germany." Caveat: sourcing for some of these organized crime groups looks pretty thin, and page Crime in Germany has not received much editorial attention, and little improvement in sourcing in the years it has existed.E.M.Gregory (talk) 10:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.