The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:28, 6 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Other than a couple of blog posts (the most notable being a piece on Business Insider that reads like a press release), I don't see any third party coverage of this event. I don't think it's notable. If it is kept, it needs to be rewritten from scratch, as every other like is overly promotional and pecocky. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:28, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article is providing information about a completely legitimate event. I don't understand what the problem is here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adamespino (talk • contribs) 19:29, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]