The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. As noted by Irn, meeting GNG is sufficient even if NACTOR or MUSICBIO aren't met, see WP:BASIC. I don't think we have consensus that articles on notable topics but created by sockpuppets are to be deleted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:39, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

JC Gonzalez

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite an effort to throw a bunch of sources at the reader (most of which only contain incidental mentions of the subject), this subject does not appear to meet WP:NACTOR. The only role that looks like it might be "significant" in NACTOR terms is Los Americans, but other roles appear to be simple guest appearances or are non-notable. So doesn't appear to meet WP:NACTOR #1. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Article was also created by a checkuser-blocked editor – see Special:Contributions/Siddfatima. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 18:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:22, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Passes the GNG: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6] -- irn (talk) 19:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I still want to see how it passes WP:NACTOR or WP:MUSICBIO – one "significant" acting role not "multiple", and have any of his songs "charted" anywhere?! --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that his roles are not significant and that he doesn't seem to have much notability, but if the article passes GNG, it doesn't have to also pass NACTOR or MUSICBIO. What matters is "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", and we have that. -- irn (talk) 20:16, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:44, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:06, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:06, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:06, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:08, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:08, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commment CAPTAIN RAJUDoes not belong in artists sort. See top of page:"Please add MUSIC-related discussions to Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Music, not here."ThatMontrealIP (talk) 11:19, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - the article shows several sources where you can verify the prominence that the artist has had in different scenarios 190.1.204.200 (talk) 19:00, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Pass: GNG: [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]

I agree, he might not be that much famouse or Notable on the Movies and tele series shown on the page, but he passes the GNG Criteria which means that he don't also needs to pass the WP:NACTOR or WP:MUSICBIO criteria. As you can see the Links above, He got significant coverage in reliable sources. --Choky1995 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Choky1995 (talk • contribs) 19:39, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note that these are the exact same sources that Irn already cited above, so this adds nothing new to the discussion. --IJBall (contribs • talk) 19:54, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.