The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:06, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JSS Medical Research[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just created by a largely single (or dual) purpose account whose only other edits -- to Paris & Simo -- are equally promotional, this detailed advertorial article is for a company that fails to net any coverage beyond news releases and non-RS trade publication stories. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:14, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:15, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Question Shawn in Montreal, have you checked if John Sampalis is a notable researcher? If he is, we could redirect the article to him. gidonb (talk) 21:57, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gscholar searches are not my area but I doubt it. He is currently an associate professor with co-authorship on just three papers. Associate profs rarely meet WP:ACADEMIC, from what I've seen at Afd. Moreover, redirect to what? There's nothing about Sampalis' research in this blatant WP:ADVERT for a company. Any such bio article would have to start from scratch. If you'd like to try your hand at that, that's great. I've no intention of doing so, as I have no competence in this area. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 12:13, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional article, self-sourced. I'm willing to redirect/rewrite to the principal, if he's notable, but found no such indication. Neither did the nominator, whom I asked for his opinion. Thanks for the response, Shawn in Montreal! gidonb (talk) 15:56, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG and WP:SPIP, references fail WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 15:05, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.