The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 15:19, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jaiden Animations[edit]

Jaiden Animations (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I originally created the first version of this page last year, but it was deleted at AFD as non-notable. I recently PRODded this particular page initially by accident because I didn't realize that, as this page has been to AFD before, PRODding is not an option. I previously tagged this reincarnation of this article for speedy deletion under WP:G4, but someone else removed that template. I think that this page should be deleted (as it has been several times already) because Jaiden is not notable, either as a person herself or for this channel. Coverage in reliable sources, while it does exist, is limited to passing mentions that do not convey nearly enough in-depth coverage to allow this person/channel to meet WP:BIO or any other notability guidelines. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 16:12, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 16:13, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 16:13, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. IntoThinAir (formerly Everymorning) talk 16:13, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The linked sources above are blogs and clickbait sites, not WP:RS supporting notability. Bakazaka (talk) 23:33, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 01:47, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Why would we draftify an article for which no reliable sources have been presented?ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:32, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 22:37, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  1. First up is an article form Flourish. Flourish is a PR Marketing agency, not a journalism outfit. Check their about page, where it says "Everything you say and do as a brand or business is PR." So no RS sources so far.
  2. second source given in their Youtube page. This is ok for non-controversial claims, but not for establishing notability. SO no RS sources yet.
  3. An article on Heavy that only has this to say about Jaiden: "They were especially excited to see their favorite creators featured in the video, including notable animators on YouTube who were previously not featured in the annual video like Jaiden Animations and Rebecca Parham." Ok tally so far: one sentence of RS in a publication that I mostly see publishing articles like "Five fast facts you need to know about -insert name of latest murderer-".
  4. A short blog-type post from Mental Music, which is a teen podcast on music topics. All we have thus far is the one sentence above from Heavy.
  5. an Article on Tubefilter, which comments on Youtube channels. Jaiden gets a mention at the end of one sentence.

Based on the five "refs" used in the article, there is no RS to support notability. I see other refs provided further up in this Afd, which aren't good either. And remember, human beings cannot live without at least some SALT each day. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 06:26, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Alexf --Tyw7 (🗣️ Talk) — If (reply) then (ping me) 06:57, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Belated comment. Sorry I was out of town as indicated in my page. -- Alexf(talk) 17:00, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.