The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:25, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jain Bhai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is more-or-less the same article as the previously deleted Harsh Vardhan Jain article. (Same subject with a new name, and created a few months later.) While it contains many references, few are relevant, and none outside of the primary sources have any real information about the subject.

As with the original article, it uses misnamed sources, forum posts, and general informational sites unrelated to the subject in order to appear researched. However, it fails to show any notability of any kind for Mr. Jain.

This is probably close enough to the original article to qualify for speedy deletion, however I felt discussion here would be better, as I was the involved in the original AfD discussion and was the nom for several related AfDs at that time. Addionne (talk) 22:48, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 18:16, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. — frankie (talk) 18:16, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Notability issues. No third-party References that detail his life. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:38, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - No coverage in reliable sources. The references in the article are mostly primary / unreliable sources. The few that are actual reliable sources don't mention the subject, or in one case, it is apparently a comment posted by the subject in the reader comments section of the article. -- Whpq (talk) 16:35, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.