The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:38, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Jet Solidaire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NCORP. Cited sources are PR or otherwise non-independent. Searching online, I was able to find some brief coverage in Le Figaro ([1]), but on its own that does not get us to WP:NCORP. The creation of this article alongside articles on simple.wiki and es.wiki, but not fr.wiki, is unusual and suggestive of possible cross-wiki spam. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Travel and tourism, Aviation, and France. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:39, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Hi guys. As usual, I have created this article because I think it is notable (almost 10 sources including Le Figaro as mentioned above). But as always, we decide all together. --BobVillars (talk) 00:07, 18 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Hey man im josh (talk) 22:13, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, review of sources in Le Figaro is too brief to meet WP:SIGCOV in my opinion. LegalSmeagolian (talk) 22:39, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Reviewing the "10 sources" again,

  Aerobernie, basically an ad, section headings include Pourquoi choisir Jet Solidaire ? (why choose Jet Solidaire?), Un service d’excellence (a service of excellence), Des critères de sélection draconiens pour une sécurité optimale (Draconian quality control for optimal security), etc. This is not independent coverage, and they advertise services to "enhance your online presence and engage your audience" (nos services peuvent vous aider à valoriser votre présence en ligne et à engager votre audience de manière significative. on their about page.

  A-Speakers FR, a bio for the company's CEO on a database. Does not appear independent, not secondary.

  l"internaute, interview with the CEO with no further analysis or commentary from the publication itself, not independent.

  JH-Coach, a blog run by a self-help coach, not reliable

  Aerocontact, database listing, not secondary coverage, likely not independent

  ASF-FR, press release from an organization announcing its partnership with Jet Solidaire, not independent

  Entrepreneurs d'Avenir, unbylined press release, which notes at the bottom lien URL https://www.jetsolidaire.com. Not independent

That's actually the end of the reference list; I guess BobVillars may be counting the company website in the external links section, as well as the Figaro article that I found. The Figaro article is an okay source; the only okay source for this topic, which means we fall short of WP:ORGCRITE by a handy margin. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:03, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The Figaro article is 7 years old and they've had nothing as good since MNewnham (talk) 01:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.