The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted hoax. Gwen Gale (talk) 15:56, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jibber Skabing (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

This could be a legitimate activity, but it lacks any real context context or any sources proving that this concept does actually exist, or why its notable. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 19:48, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I noticed right after I posted this AfD, another contributor nominated this for speedy deletion as patent nonsense, but I did want to give the benefit of the doubt. Mister Senseless™ (Speak - Contributions) 19:50, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Clearly a hoax, and if not, certainly non-notable. Zero Google hits. Nadda. It's made up nonsense. Proxy User (talk) 20:19, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete—should this be substantiated, it would make an interesting article. With no verifiability, however, it looks like nonsense. While I'm willing to give the benefit of the doubt (and have removed the speedy templates accordingly), I don't want to let nonsense through. If sources aren't provided soon, this should be deleted. ((Nihiltres|talk|log)) 21:14, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Likely hoax, if not, still failing WP:RS and WP:N. No hits on Google, either. — neuro^(talk) 21:25, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Fails WP:N and WP:CS. I honestly would not have any objection if someone G1'd this article. Beano (talk) 23:15, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Obvious hoax. Edward321 (talk) 23:56, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete And don't blank the discussion. The JPS^{talk to me} 15:17, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Reads like nonsense. No ghits. Looks like G1 material to me. -- Alexf^(talk) 15:27, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.