The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. I see a consensus to Keep given the sources Cunard has found. Liz Read! Talk! 06:08, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Justin Qiang[edit]

Justin Qiang (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only ever played in the minors, and career seems to have stalled after becoming a free agent in 2020. I can't see that there's enough coverage to justify a GNG pass (usual caveat: I don't speak Chinese and can't search it except through GTranslate). ♠PMC(talk) 06:04, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per GNG. Rlendog (talk) 15:03, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, the subject easily passes WP:GNG per the extensive sourcing presented above. 2601:204:C901:B740:F921:9566:95E3:FAA2 (talk) 17:23, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, passes GNC as extremely well-sourced, especially taking into account the information found during this discussion. He is the first Tibetan to be signed by a Major League baseball team, which is notable to Tibet, notable in China, and notable every which way. If he ever makes it back to the show maybe the Dalai Lama will throw out the first pitch. Randy Kryn (talk) 22:34, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He's already been released after playing only 17 games in the lowest possible minor league. It's a crystal clear WP:BLP1E. SportingFlyer T·C 23:25, 8 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Not too sure that WP:BLP1E can be validly invoked here, (at a minimum it’s certainly not WP:Run of the mill) as there appears to be coverage of his acting, childhood, personality, and family, the depth of which is unusual for someone known only for a single baseball event. 2601:204:C901:B740:3854:AE53:187C:E0DB (talk) 03:22, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Let's use some common sense here. This is clearly a "first X in Y" article. The only coverage he received is because he signed with a team as a baseball player, which is also clearly one event. He was not a notable player in the slightest - he played 17 games in the lowest possible minor league, was then released, never played again, and doesn't appear to have any continuing coverage, I cannot confirm the date on the supposed 2023 article as there's no date on that one. He's likely to remain a low profile individual, and the fact he got signed is very "run of the mill." So all phases of BIO1E/BLP1E are satisfied. He would have clearly failed our old WP:NBASE guideline, and I haven't checked to see if print baseball encyclopedias still exist, but he would not have been mentioned in any of the old ones I had if they were updated and re-printed to now. SportingFlyer T·C 10:23, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
SIGCOV (albeit mostly in Chinese) mainly relating to a non-routine event (his signing), but which led to him being profiled by various media sources. Significant to baseball in China. Would not make sense to cover this signing as an article like Signing of Justin Qiang or similar. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 18:54, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Signing a player is almost always a routine event, and even having reviewed the Chinese coverage I see no reason why this would possibly be considered non-routine, especially given our guidelines X in Y, the fact he would have clearly failed our now deprecated sports SNG for baseball, and the fact WP:BLP1E clearly covers articles like this. SportingFlyer T·C 22:00, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per GNG given media coverage in Chinese. Relevant figure to baseball in Tibet and China. Article can certainly be improved, though. D. Benjamin Miller (talk) 18:55, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.