The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Without consensus that the title is sufficient for notability, which we do not have, there is no pass of GNG. Star Mississippi 04:30, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jyotirmay Chakravarty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It's difficult to do a BEFORE, but the argument from the creator seems to be that this job title confers notability. I have not found any evidence that it does, and sources seem to be routine, bare mentions, etc., so I think this fails GNG. Valereee (talk) 00:36, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India. Valereee (talk) 00:36, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police and Assam. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 08:01, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: As per nom. LordVoldemort728 (talk) 11:05, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:50, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Very senior officer with sufficient sourcing to meet WP:GNG. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:10, 16 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  @Necrothesp, the sources don't seem to support it. All of them seem to be bare mentions, routine, etc. Are you saying the job title confers notability? Or if it's the sources, which would be the best sources for supporting that? I'm just not easily seeing it. Valereee (talk) 20:45, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  I'm saying both. -- Necrothesp (talk) 08:21, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• zKeep as a WP:GNG pass, [1], [2], [3]. Notable officer. Yandeńo (talk) 15:30, 17 November 2022 (UTC) (sock strike Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:21, 20 November 2022 (UTC))[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:46, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.