The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SoWhy 07:40, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

KSL Capital Partners (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of any significant notability. Refs are directory style listings and notices about acquisitions plus dead links - nothing about the company itself. Searches reveal little more of any substance. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   15:26, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  15:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  15:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  FITINDIA  15:37, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:21, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable & promotional purposes. Light2021 (talk) 11:09, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I am not seeing better than acquisition announcements, etc.: routine coverage which can help verify but do not provide the substantial coverage needed to demonstrate that the firm is of encyclopaedic notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 06:40, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 12:42, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. "It holds US$3.4 billion in assets.".Zigzig20s (talk) 21:35, 1 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- no significant coverage that discusses the subject directly and in detail. Sources included in the article are directories or coverage of routine transactions, none of which are sufficient for notability. Holds $X in assets is not a criterion that's part of WP:NORG. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:14, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.