The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was No consensus. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:03, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kalyan Varma

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Most of the references are dead. The existing links doesn't seem to meet the notability guidelines JK (talk) 05:59, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 March 17. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 06:29, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:37, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Question / comment: None of the links seems to be marked as dead. Did you look for them within web.archive.org? ¶ He's got this at the Natural History Museum website, an interview in something called the Economic Times, a long interview in something called 6bridges, more. -- Hoary (talk) 14:21, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. One interview in the Economic Times Business doesn't make someone notable. Fowler&fowler «Talk» 00:51, 21 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, → Call me Hahc21 05:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. He's an award-winning person, having earned National History Museum Wildlife Photographer of the Year (per Hoary). Now, the references section needs some SERIOUS work because just putting the article link is not acceptable, and a few dead links should be fixed. But the article needs work, not deletion. GRUcrule (talk) 19:34, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ymblanter (talk) 08:45, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, I think that the sources listed by User:Hoary above are quite sufficient to push this past the WP:GNG, in that they are independent and substantial. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 08:54, 5 April 2014 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as fails GNG -→Davey2010→→Talk to me!→ 23:17, 11 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete none of the awards appear to have got him in depth independent coverage in muliple sources. Maybe because the awards aren't that big a deal; I'm really not sure. Stuartyeates (talk) 11:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.