The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Lake Urmia (WP:NAC) CTJF83 chat 06:40, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kazem-Dashi

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see how this rock is notable. I redirected it to Lake Urmia but my redirection was redirected with an edit summary saying my edit was vandalism. Nice. :-) Dougweller (talk) 18:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The rock is a major tourist attraction in West Azarbaijan Province. You have blanked and redirected the article without discussion. Blanking is considered vandalism. :-) --Professional Assassin (talk) 18:47, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have to blank to redirect, and you know I am sure that that isn't vandalism. But if it's notable, then there's no problem, just provide the evidence. I did look, but you may have sources I couldn't find. It would have helped if you'd added them before reverting the redirect, I did say in my edit summary it didn't appear notable. Dougweller (talk) 18:53, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:10, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, I'd already looked for sources for this rock and I can find no significant coverage. There is nothing to suggest that it is notable. Redirecting to the lake is the best thing to do. Professional Assassin's belief that a redirect is vandalism is very far off the mark. Fences&Windows 20:38, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Lake Urmia - I just can't find any decent non-WP coverage, even under its Farsi title "کاظم‌داشی" [1]. I'll change my mind if someone can find anything substantial. --Oakshade (talk) 06:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect seems the best option. Beyond My Ken (talk) 06:42, 24 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect - a tourist attraction would show up in one of many tourism guidebooks. I cannot find any evidence that this is a notable tourist attraction that can support a stand alone article. - Whpq (talk) 17:34, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Lake Urmia. Plvekamp (talk) 00:18, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.