The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Texas Rangers minor league players. Spartaz Humbug! 13:22, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kellin Deglan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable minor league player. The sourcing is decent, but it's not at "multiple reliable source" level for GNG. Wizardman 23:24, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:46, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. lavender|(formerlyHMSSolent|lambast 00:47, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:59, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What is your basis for this assertion? The qualifiers are always referred to as a round of the tournament and it's listed as part of the tournament schedule. (see here) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tchaliburton (talkcontribs) 14:49, October 17, 2014
The same reason why the olympics qualifying events arent considered to be actually part of the olympics.Spanneraol (talk) 15:47, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The Olympics aren't comparable. They have separate qualifying events. The WBC does not. The qualifying round is part of the WBC as far as I can tell. Tchaliburton (talk) 18:41, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The qualifying events for the WBC take place months before the rest of the tournament, they can be considered separate events also. Spanneraol (talk) 18:58, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
You may consider them separate events, but they are not. Tchaliburton (talk) 19:22, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
What I'm curious about Spanner is why you say delete and not merge, considering that there are enough sources to at least make a credible case for GNG (though it may not make it, I'm debating between keep and merge myself). – Muboshgu (talk) 14:53, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Really it's because i didn't realize he was with the Rangers... the article didn't mention it before (said he was part of the Crawdads) and i was too lazy to look into it. My bad. Spanneraol (talk) 15:47, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Ah gotcha. I hadn't seen the page until that was corrected, then. – Muboshgu (talk) 18:39, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.