The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:41, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kent/Sussex Detoxification Center (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No significant coverage. Fails WP:CORP. SL93 (talk) 21:56, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I got a few hits on Google Books, but they're a bit strange - see:

• Addiction Recovery Tools: A Practical Handbook
• Addiction Medicine: Science and Practice, Volume 1
• Clinical Addiction Psychiatry

Each of these books mentions the Kent/Sussex Detoxification Center - but all using exactly the same text, word for word. I don't have access to the books, but they all appear to be edited collections (from reputable publishers) - perhaps the same article, written by someone related to the center, being submitted to multiple collections? It's talking about acupuncture in alleviating addiction - might be worth a medical editor with experience in this area taking a look, I'll drop a note at WikiProject Medicine. GirthSummit _(blether) 18:51, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete per nominators rationale--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 21:51, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• delete Agree needs more coverage. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 01:44, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:42. Alexbrn (talk) 08:12, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.