The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There are enough well-founded comments from long established users, who found sources to suggest notability and explained why the article should be improved instead of deleted. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:57, 27 May 2021 (UTC) Note: Ritchie333 (talk · contribs) has never heard of Kevin Paffrath until just now and closed the AfD based on judgement after closing hundreds, if not thousands of other discussions. Still, if you want to drag him off to deletion review, that's your right and your privilege ;-) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kevin Paffrath[edit]

Kevin Paffrath (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG and NPOL. Only routine coverage of his gubernatorial candidacy. Obviously, just running for office does not create notability. I do not see any coverage on his Youtube channel. There is one (vanity?) article about his earnings, but otherwise I don't see any in-depth reliable coverage. 1.6 million followers is a lot but that does not create notability by itself (see Wikipedia:WikiProject YouTube/Notability) ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 18:51, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 18:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 18:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 18:57, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Being interviewed on Fox News does not create notability. And the subject making videos about himself certainly does not. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 14:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think 'waiting' is a good idea, because then the article will just remain indefinitely. If unnotable pages aren't flagged as they are created, they will remain for years or decades. It happens consistently. ‡ Єl Cid of Valencia talk 23:47, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

  • Unfortunately those sorts of sources (I may have missed one) appear to be routine campaign articles. Wikipedia keeps or deletes articles based on enduring notability, and the vast majority of political candidates do not have enduring notability, and he hasn't risen to that level yet. While it's not impossible he would be notable as a Youtuber, not only has that not been made clear, but this article was clearly created to support his candidacy. SportingFlyer T·C 23:28, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't think the Nashville Post is significant - it's just about a lawsuit, and the Curbed article was written before their New Yorker purchase. Ignoring the campaign, I still don't think it's enough: there's a reason why this article was launched to co-incide with the campaign. SportingFlyer T·C 12:03, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Curbed article was written 5 days after Vox Media's purchase of Curbed was announced. Regardless, I think Curbed has been a reliable source both before and after its acquisition. I agree that the Nashville Post article is marginal. Empire3131 (talk) 15:34, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.