The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a hoax. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:57, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kfar Yona Railway Station

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've not found any thrace on Google, Kfar Yona article says that there is no station, and this Israel Railways map (past and present) shows no rail nearby the city (between Netanya and Tulkarm, see OSM). Btw, in the lead text, I've not understood a fact: the station belongs to British Railways too... This AFD is just to clarify the situation. Dэя-Бøяg 19:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just a note: the author, a new user named Itailevi44444, has a sp named Itailevi33333, that contributed to the same article. --Dэя-Бøяg 19:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I request a speedy deletion as evident hoax: I found the page Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Itailevi00 and, adding this to what I wrote above, I have no more doubts about the vandalisms. Btw, users created also SYM Joyride 125 Evo and Haifa Symphony Orchestra. Both article look like valid. --Dэя-Бøяg 19:26, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as A11. Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 22:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 22:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete. Per Israeli Railways stations list - [1] there is no such station and it's not even being planned. Clearly it's a hoax. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 11:04, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Just to let you know that I had placed a speedy deletion tag indicating that this Afd had identified this article as a blatant hoax -- but it was refused. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Stupid policy that AfD has to be closed prior to making a bold actian. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 05:39, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    - It's not really policy, I think, because I've seen many admins take this very action. It's really luck-of-the-draw, I think, as to which admin happens to come along. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:55, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.