This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Joyous (talk) 17:16, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

Not notable. TheCoffee 05:30, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

New users please read: You are welcome to comment but please add your comments to the bottom of the page (not the top) and sign them by adding four tildes (~~~~) which will automatically add your username or IP address and the time and date. Please do not alter the comments or votes of others; this is considered vandalism and grounds for blocking. Please do not comment or vote multiple times pretending you are different people; such comments and votes will be deleted or ignored. Read this for more information. Thank you.

• Keep. Reputable author with noteable sources; Google search on Kristopher + Kubicki reveals 3400 hits, google search on kris + kubicki yields several hundred more. HackJandy
  • A more meaningful pair of search results: "kris kubicki" yields 54 unique hits, and "kristopher kubicki" yields 63. For comparison, searches for my name in this manner yield 22 unique results, and I've never published anything on the web besides a blog that nobody but my family reads. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 12:25, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. A journalist is journalist, right? User:Jarredwalton

• Note: The above unsigned votes are from the creator of the article. TheCoffee 06:39, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Not quite true, though I did perform a slight edit of the article. The original author is Kristopher Kubicki. (--Jarred Walton)
  • Incorrect. I am not Kris Kubicki. HackJandy 16:48, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• • But the article says you work with him, so hardly a third party affirmation. Average Earthman 08:47, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Vanity. -R. fiend 16:06, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Non-notable/vanity. --Ragib 07:02, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not notable, self-professed vanity. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 12:22, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Incorrect. I am not Kris Kubicki. Not self-professed. HackJandy 16:48, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, even if his website were notable (no clue whether it is or not), there's no sign that he is individually notable. Dcarrano 16:28, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • AnandTech is indeed a notable website for computer hardware enthusiasts. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 16:33, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
  • Sun Microsystems seems to vouch for the author link Anandtech has it's own wikipedia entry.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.210.104.251 (talk • contribs)
• Keep. and expand. He also discovered an important vulnerability in xlreader.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.210.104.251 (talk • contribs)

• Second edit.

• Keep This was the Beo-tch who raided all those xboxs.. His cunning intelect and suave demeaner demands attention, as well as his unique perspective of life. To delete a soul of this magnatude would be nothing less than ignorance, not to mention a crime against humanity.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.167.210.113 (talk • contribs)

• Second edit.

• Delete as per comments above. Gamaliel 17:23, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Kristopher is a high-level contributor to the Anandtech website and has done much work in the online community of web journalists/reviewers. He recruited myself along with several others into this business. Dave_graham

• Third edit.

• Keep . Microsoft reveals 2,235 entries 212.36.15.14 17:30, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • No, it reveals 184. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 17:36, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
    • No you are incorrect. That is 184 PAGES. Page 19 of 184 results containing "kristopher kubicki" (0.13 seconds) 144.118.196.165 20:14, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
      • If that's the case, then where's the link to get to the other 165 pages of results? This is just like getting to the end of the line on Google's search. Microsoft merely phrases this bit of info on its search page awkwardly. There are 184 results. 18 pages of 10 results each plus 1 page of 4 results equals 184. If there were 184 pages of results, that would indicate that there are around 1,840 results, not 2,235. The 2,235 figure is an estimate. AиDя01DTALKEMAIL 21:10, July 22, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Kris has done a lot of good work and will likely become more famous than he already is. Then again, maybe we need a Jonathan Rockway page too :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrockway (talk • contribs)
• Delete. Non-notable and the "support hosiery" isn't helping. - Lucky 6.9 20:49, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Kris has done a lot of good work and and his knowledege is well above his peers. I could even say that he will be better than. He's well known in the Computer World @ UIC and in many unversities.He's an editor in Anandtech, among the various things he does.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.252.245.183 (talk • contribs)

• Delete And block these sock puppet voters. --malathion ^talk 21:40, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The socks have convinced me. Capitalistroadster 23:10, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn vanity. The socks, the socks! --Etacar11 23:55, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. NN, and sockpuppet limit has been reached. --Calton | Talk 00:15, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
• Strong delete. Vanity, non-notable, defended by obnoxious sock puppets, etc. Binadot 22:44, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete with prejudice. Sockpuppet limit reached and exceeded. --Scimitar ^parley 18:21, 27 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.