The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that notability has not been shown, and that sources are questionable SilkTork ✔Tea time 21:16, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Laura Cavender

[edit]
Laura Cavender (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable individual, fails WP:NMODEL, WP:CREATIVE and WP:BAND. Ref #1/bodyspace & Ref #6/ReverbNation are in self-edited listings/forums so are not reliable sources, Ref#2 is from a free-subscription magazine, Ref #8/btsp is a repeat of Ref #2 and cited refs do not prove championship assertion. Shearonink (talk) 16:23, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:51, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
That 'Playboy cover' is a notice with a picture that she had a DJ gig at a Dallas TX nightclub, it is not that she had a Playboy magazine "cover". "Kandy" magazine is a free-subscription (given away) magazine, the link you posted above is to a 'twitter' type of page at that magazine and it seems mainly to be a website for women to post pictures on. "Mixed" magazine (from their own website) is "an online men site featuring the hottest models" and I can find no subscription information for it. Cavender does have racy pictures posted at various websites...does every lingerie model on the Internet get their own Wikipedia article? Shearonink (talk) 16:29, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Kandy says that they get 100k visitors a month.
and RKPubs the company behind American Curves claims to have 100k printed magazines (dunno in which time/per issue?). mabdul 16:50, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Is there any independent verification of these asserted subscription/website visit figures? Shearonink (talk) 16:17, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 13:54, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.