The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 09:20, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lavinia Woodward[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a stereotypical WP:BLP1E, which has blown out of all proportion by steam coming out of The Sun and the Daily Mail's ears. Although everything in the article is sourced, they are basically the same story being reported in multiple places, and there is far too much information cited to The Sun. I think we're best off leaving this article out - unless it somehow acquires longer-lasting significance in British law, which I find unlikely. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:55, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 11:00, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 11:00, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 11:00, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this falls clearly under WP:BLP1E and that unless sentencing on September 25th, 2017 leads to developments which justify the creation of a page on Lavinia Woodward, it should probably be deleted until then. 87.224.90.205 (talk) 11:19, 28 June 2017 (UTC) — 87.224.90.205 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Delete -- quintessential BLP1E, there's really no way around it. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 11:32, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I have nuked all the problematic BLP material from the article, so whats left now is pretty much whats compliant RE the subject. There probably is scope for merging or incorporating this into an article on the inequalities in the UK justice system, the good sources left in the article are not concerned about the subject, so much as the discussion the sentencing comments have caused. When the sentence actually comes in, I expect the discussion to pick up again. Only in death does duty end (talk) 11:36, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - yes as per above, very single event Govindaharihari (talk) 20:54, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agreed, classic WP:BLP1E material. Edwardx (talk) 18:26, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for BLP1E reasons. Not notable, the event probably does not deserve mention as NOTNEWS. --Bejnar (talk) 05:36, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.