The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT#1. @O1lI0: Please review the deletion policy and WP:BEFORE. We don't delete articles because they contain errors or are inadequately referenced. You can discuss problems with the article's content on its talk page. – Joe (talk) 15:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC) (non-admin closure) – Joe (talk) 15:28, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Li Jiancheng

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Today, there is a new user who thinks the content is wrong.Because he did not provide any reference source, I can not judge true and false.If it is wrong it should be deleted. If it is correct it should be retained.The article has only one reference source, and that is the dead link, so the article can not verify the content. O1lI0 (talk) 13:53, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:15, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:15, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not seeing why this needs to go straight to AFD for a content dispute. We don't delete such articles merely because they may contain mistakes as @Elainr: has claimed -- we try to correct the errors. There's been no discussion on the article talk page and precious little at User talk:Elainr. I really don't see a valid reason to delete. Keep and fix, if needed. If the article is correct, and the new user is edit warring, then there are other courses of action. (indeed, I see the nominator's first comment on User talk:Elainr was to issue a level three warning.) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:23, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.