The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 00:22, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Originally I proposed this game for deletion due to no evidence of notability and since the website of the creators has no Alexa rank. The author of the article removed the tag. I must say in his favour that he did attempt to explain that: He argued that Alexa is not a fair measure and that I should have used Google or Yahoo instead, which I did: 783 total Google hits, of these 33 unique ones; Yahoo gave a total of over 1000 hits, but only 62 unique ones. (I also tried Altavista, with a similar result.) He also said that it is listed in the List of controversial games (where an unregistered User:67.190.124.84 added it); well, in order for a game to be controversial, it should have caused a controversy - am I wrong? You'll have to do much better to persuade me that the game is notable; until then, my vote remains delete. - Mike Rosoft 00:51, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

• Weak delete per nom. Royboycrashfan 00:54, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. --Saforrest 01:51, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Honest question here, as the original author--what's the notability threshold? Please don't tell me that, like obscenity, you know it when you see it. Thanos6 02:10, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • See Wikipedia:Notability. But yes, there's definitely an element of subjectivity. --Saforrest 03:23, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • Then I'm going to respectively disagree, and say that to me, this counts as notable.
      • Fair enough; what part of the WP:WEB criteria do you think this site fulfills? Delete per nom pending a positive answer. RGTraynor 19:58, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • 1. 2; it won the TOP DOG award from "Home of the Underdogs" (they are having website difficulties at the moment or I'd give you a link). I suppose that could qualify it for #1, too. Thanos6 20:20, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong keep This game changed my life. --Pjakubo86 05:17, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  User:Pjakubo86 has 3 main article-space contributions, 1 of which is nominating for deletion an article where everyone else has voted "strong keep". —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-04-09 08:25Z

• Delete per nom. Montco 05:54, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no evidence of notability; Wikipedia is not gamefaqs, nor a soapbox. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-04-09 08:22Z
• Delete per nom. Metamagician3000 09:42, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep for disagreement on what counts as notable. Thanos6 12:52, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Thanos6. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 14:10, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• I've read its Google coverage, and I'm not impressed. Delete. DS 16:22, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, definitely has not established notability. NTK 02:22, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, sounds like a creation of a demented right-wing activist, does not sound the least bit notable. Haikupoet 02:37, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 06:37, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • "s?" Thanos6 06:56, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • comment Sorry, finger slipped while voting, I meant to say delete. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. ⇒ SWATJester ^Ready Aim _Fire! 16:04, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete nn.ßlηguγɛη | Have your say!!! 00:37, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, because the article does not indicate any sources for notability, which is dubious to say the least. Sandstein 20:18, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Quarl. -- Scientizzle 21:21, 14 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]