The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Chinese unification. Consensus is that this is an aspect of the topic Chinese unification and should be covered there (in a WP:DUE manner), if at all. Sandstein 10:46, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Liberation of Taiwan[edit]

Liberation of Taiwan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

POV fork of Chinese unification. LondonIP (talk) 01:39, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:51, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2022 January 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 01:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment This nomination was malformed, and should be fixed now. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 02:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep we should not rush to delete stubs simply because they are stubs, the term was an official policy of China for a period and so is not a POV Fork as you claim it is. Xoltered (talk) 05:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Merge into Chinese unification where more editors will see it and a more balanced article may result. A1415 (talk) 08:19, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If it is to be merged, then we should have a specific section regarding the old policy. Xoltered (talk) 01:09, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or merge fails WP:GNG as far as I can tell. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 02:05, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge to Chinese unification, unless someone can find sources showing that the term itself is notable separately from the overall topic. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 21:34, 21 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The zh and ja articles are much more in depth. Possible room for expansion? Jumpytoo Talk 01:59, 22 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  Thanks for pointing that out. The zh.wikipedia article seems to be about the concept of the Chinese government taking over Taiwan using military force, which would be a subtopic of Chinese unification. I think that can work as a standalone article. I'm not sure whether or not this is the best title for it. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 19:31, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.