The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:29, 4 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Lila Shaara

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. No references and a google search turns up very little: an article in a local paper is the only thing that looks like a RS, and does not on its own satisfy WP:SIGCOV. JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 17:19, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable author, even the Random House website doesn't have much to say about her at this time. Seaphoto^Talk 18:37, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Seaphoto, et al. The usual caveat applies, though - if the subject comes up with a notable work, and if such generates sources about the subject, then we may end up revisiting this one. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 20:19, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:20, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:AUTHOR and WP:BK. Qworty (talk) 23:30, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. DThomsen8 (talk) 13:56, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.