The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SilkTork *^YES! 13:26, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lindsey White (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

A senior lecturer at Auckland University of Technology who, of course, does research, but does not seem to pass the Professor Test. --Dynaflow babble 21:23, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. Does not seem to meet notability wrt WP:ACADEMIC. Eddie.willers (talk) 01:18, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Not a notable prof. Fences and windows (talk) 04:07, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:48, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete, fails WP:N, not one exact match from the NZ Herald, stuff.co.nz, 3News, TVNZ news websites. Content is copyvio, copy/paste from the AUT website. XLerate (talk) 06:32, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Per nom. Passes neither WP:PROF nor WP:BIO. May become notable in the future, but not yet there.--Eric Yurken (talk) 00:42, 17 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.