The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Game Room. Star Mississippi 14:37, 14 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of Game Room games[edit]

List of Game Room games (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I've AfD'ed this listicle two and half years ago, but no consensus. Maybe this time it's different.

It's a very large table of games that were released for the Game Room emulator, which was available for the Xbox 360 console and Microsoft Windows PCs. WP:NOTCATALOG was my main argument then and that hasn't changed. List of x games for x service. It's also obsolete, the service is no longer available, if that matters at all. And it's completely unsourced. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 16:31, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge - I don't see a problem in documenting this sort of information on Wikipedia - it seems like it could go a long way in explaining the game's concept/premise - but both the list, and the game itself, have very small articles. It doesn't really need to be split out into 2 separate articles. Sergecross73 msg me 17:50, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Lists. Shellwood (talk) 18:18, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as described. Certain titles perhaps, not the entire listing. Oaktree b (talk) 19:19, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge as described. The content has merit, but I concur having it in a separate article no longer makes sense. As to sourcing, the situation is not unlike a movie's plot summary; the source is the product itself. When stating objective facts that can be verified within the content, explicit sourcing is not required. --McDoobAU93 15:44, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment For the above !votes, Merge with what article for clarification. PerryPerryD Talk To Me 16:12, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge Wikipedia is WP:NOTDIR and we don't need a catalog of every title released on every technology. There is already an article for this as an WP:ATD. Archrogue (talk) 18:51, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.