The result was delete. The WP:NOT concerns are clearly stated and the argument to keep material because some editors find it useful is not generally accepted at AfD. For those who do find the content useful, note that one of the participants has transferred these lists to Fandom here. RL0919 (talk) 22:31, 14 January 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
Per previous deletions of "list of games temporarily offered for free on a games' service" per (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Games with Gold games (2nd nomination) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of free Epic Games Store games, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Humble Bundles (2nd nomination)) these pages fail WP:NOT#CATALOG. A complete list of games available for a platform is fine, but outlining those games that were free at one point off this storefront is not appropriate. Masem (t) 20:02, 7 January 2020 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages because they are part of the same series of Instant Game Collections in different regions: