The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  06:08, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of Seven Network slogans[edit]

List of Seven Network slogans (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Original research, unreferenced. See Articles for deletion/List of Nine Network slogans(2nd nomination) Kernosky ^talk2me! 12:54, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 16:48, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:27, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:27, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 17:27, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. I'd even argue that it's non-notable trivia. --AussieLegend (✉) 08:31, 22 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep or merge The lack of references is troubling, but I think network slogans are notable. Article should be kept, or relevant content merged as a section on articles, eg. Seven Network, 7Two, etc. -- Whats new?^(talk) 09:30, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:INFO: unreferenced trivia and indiscriminate collection of information. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:42, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:43, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep for the 4th, 5th, and 6th, delete in the 7th, then restore This does not meet the definition of "original research" in that it is drawing new conclusions. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 02:23, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The American and Canadian television networks have had their 'list of network slogans' articles all deleted in the last five years as mainly WP:PROMO content that depends on YouTube videos and TV Guide scans that do not meet our sourcing guidelines. Here...we have absolutely nothing. For all we know, an IP vandal could insert Seven...because Kerry Packer likes to (something probably libelous) and we'd call it good. This is all non-notable fancruft that has no business here and the zero sources don't give me hope that in seven days we'll be well-sourced. Nate • (chatter) 03:51, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Nate. If this information is considered to be worth including in Wikipedia at all, it belongs on the pages of the network and its respective stations, respectively, not as a separate article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:38, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.