The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete all - there is a clear consensus that "cultural icon" is not an appropriate WP:LISTCRIT. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 23:17, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

List of cultural icons of Australia[edit]

List of cultural icons of Australia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Following the deletion of List of cultural icons of Scotland (AfD), I'd like to see if there's consensus to delete this whole family of articles. The same arguments made in the Scotland AfD apply equally to all of these; the term "cultural icon" is so vague, so subjective, and so widely and variously applied, that these lists can never be encyclopedic. Either they include every object, person, place or concept which has ever been referred to as a "cultural icon"; or else editors must engage in an unacceptable amount of original research in deciding which items to include. (For at least one of these articles, List of cultural icons of England, an editor once attempted to devise an objective selection criteria – the resulting list had just seven items, and was even more arbitrary than before.) We can, and do, provide readers with well-sourced, encyclopedic articles on the culture of Australia, culture of England, etc., but this is simply not a subject which can be boiled down into a list.

Previous AfDs
* WP:Articles for deletion/List of cultural icons of England (2012) – Group nomination of eight "cultural icon" articles; closed as keep (despite an 8-4 numerical consensus to delete)
Sojourner in the earth (talk) 19:22, 7 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.