The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. General consensus seems to be to keep the article as is, another re-list wouldn't benefit the article in my opinion. Closing this as keep. (non-admin closure) st170e^talk 01:34, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of inns in Bucharest[edit]

List of inns in Bucharest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NOTTRAVEL and WP:LISTN. Nothing notable about this stand alone list other than a potential travel guide. Ajf773 (talk) 04:23, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - the nominator appears to miss the point, which is that these inns are all quite historic, some dating to the 17th century. Now, whether Category:Inns in Bucharest is sufficient to the purpose of recording these entities is an open question (although I would weigh in on the side of the list, at least until the red links are filled), but it is not primarily for travel-guide purposes, especially as some of these have long since disappeared. - Biruitorul ^Talk 07:01, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Easily passes WP:LISTN, for example see Potra's The Bucharest Inns (1943). Andrew D. (talk) 12:16, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. Ajf773 (talk) 20:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep - Looks to be a viable list. No objection to removing the redlinks until they have articles, but inclusion criteria can be developed on the talk page. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 15:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:10, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I thought Wiki loved monuments? --Andreas Philopater (talk) 23:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment from nominator. Is there any objection to redirecting to List of buildings in Bucharest?. Ajf773 (talk) 23:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not on my part, but I'd guess that's really a question for the talkpage, not for the AfD discussion. --Andreas Philopater (talk) 19:42, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.