![]() | This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2011 May 8. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was keep. Hahahaha. Humour aside, I agree that this article supplements pieing, and should therefore be kept given that the list content satisfies biography guidelines. --Deryck C. 23:59, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Several non-notable listings, unsourced listings, indiscriminate info. This list adds nothing to the viewer's understanding of the concept of pieing. Also, SPLUT! (First two AFDs from 2007 and 2008 both closed as keep due to WP:IDONTLIKEIT from the nominator; third closed as no consensus in 2008.) Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 20:55, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete. Does anybody care? Is this a reason for living? What's the point? And numerous similar questions rushed through my mind. "Pieing" itself is not a notable activity. Although there are numerous examples of such activity. "Pieing" cannot inherit notability from notables who have been pied. Maybe there is a reason for living when one can nominate such lists for deletion. Or is there? Nipsonanomhmata (Talk) 23:40, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]