The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singu larity 05:53, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

List of people with breast implants[edit]

AfDs for this article:

WP:NOT#IINFO based on a non-notable connection. Having breast implants is no longer an unusual, or more importantly, a notable characteristic. This is no more encyclopedic than a List of people who have had facelifts, or a List of people who wear toupees. It's sourced, but who cares? The women who are specifically notable for their implants (ie Lolo Ferrari) should be mentioned in the Breast implant article. Masaruemoto 00:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:IINFO and WP:NOT#DIR. Loosely associated topic -- who cares if it's verified? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 02:04, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the nom. It is not a notable linkage. JodyB_{yak, yak, yak} 02:11, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I guess there was a certain point at which this would have been novel enough to be somewhat encyclopedic, but it's pretty common these days, especially if (as the article suggests) we're including models, transsexuals, and porn stars. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 02:21, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Having breast implants does not make one notable. Bart133 ^{(t) (c)} 03:52, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This article is worthless without pics. --Targeman 04:05, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Never knew that Genesis P-Orridge had implants - what a nut. Indiscriminate very partial list of some random people with implants. Non-maintainable, highly skewed to English-speaking individuals and all round worthless crap. At least its sourced though. Bigdaddy1981 04:54, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, trivia, should arguably have been deleted the first time around. >Radiant< 08:30, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete trivial connection, not suitable for Wikipedia. Hut 8.5 10:25, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am pleasantly surprised to find that the list is sourced, but still too trivial of a list. Garion96 (talk) 19:16, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Bart133 says all that needs to be said --Malcolmxl5 21:51, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. per uses above. James Luftan ^contribs 23:28, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Way to many people would qualify for this list unfortunately. It is to common and trivial. Jmm6f488 00:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The public has a right to know. Mandsford 02:02, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Looks like this may be snowballing, but I gotta say delete again per WP:IINFO. Goodnightmush^Talk 03:50, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. This issue of breast implants is notable, this article saves a similar list from filling the main article. What also saves it for me is the fact it's sourced, so it's not just a bunch of speculation, rumors and guesses. 23skidoo 15:54, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "having fake boobs" is not a useful basis for grouping people in an encyclopedia. Zocky | picture popups 08:16, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This grouping is nonencyclopedic and somewhat offensive. Delete -- after adding some notable examples of celebrity implants and unusual implant cases to the Breast implant article, possibly including (but not necessarily limited to) Carol Doda (famous as a topless dancer), Maxi Mounds (holder of the Guinness World Record for "World's Largest Augmented Breasts"), Jenny Jones (talked about the subject on TV).--orlady 15:43, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.