The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Enigma^msg 03:06, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lofree[edit]

Lofree (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable run of the mill consumer electronics company that fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Article fails the newly-strengthened NCORP guideline, as it lacks in-depth coverage that asserts a claim to significance. The 'best' reference the article employs is an article [1] by a forbes contributor (with the usual disclaimer "contributors opinions are their own") that heavily features quotes from the founders of Lofree. The majority of the other sources cited are product reviews that do not go into depth about the inner workings of the subject company, an thus are not in-depth coverage as mandated by NCORP. In short, neither the article nor its sources assert a claim to encyclopedic significance, and the company fails Wikipedia's guidelines for notability. SamHolt6 (talk) 00:59, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per SamHolt6. Death pool (talk) 03:50, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 04:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 04:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 04:44, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agree with nom, good detailed nomination, fails GNG and WP:NCORP and WP:SPIP either. Wikipedia is not a substitute for a company sales catalogue. HighKing⁺⁺ 16:06, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.