The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Nominator has withdrawn and there are no !votes for delete. My close reflects there now being no valid reason left to dicsuss deletion. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 20:56, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Log Kya Kahenge (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for films (contested prod) – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Dwaipayan (talk) 23:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Bollywood film starring major actors such as Shatrughan Sinha, Shabana Azmi and Sanjeev Kumar. No online review may be available for this pre-internet era film. However, the film gets mentioned in articles such as [1], [2] and [3]. It seems the story was remarkable for the social scenario of the era.--Dwaipayan (talk) 23:35, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Sourcable article[4][5] for pre-internet Indian Hindi film topic. We inprove the improvable, not delete. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:14, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep And might I add this is notable in its own right in women's society in India where this is a common stigma which the film draws upon.♦ Dr. Blofeld 16:34, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Notable film of notable Indian film stars, the links produced above also supports keeping the article. --DℬigXray 17:34, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Update: though AFD is not intended to "force" a cleanup, a 15x expansion and sourcing by Dr. Blofield per WP:ATD has made a "keep" a no-brainer. That aside, the nom might remember that notability is dependent upon sources being available, and not that they be used, and so perhaps might consider a withdrawal? Kudos to Dr. Blofield! Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 18:34, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Happy to withdraw. – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:45, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.