![]() |
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:53, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Don't see any reliable sources that discusses it either in the article or in my cursory Google search. Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:15, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Trojan horse (computing). (non-admin closure) Steven Zhang Get involved in DR! 01:49, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Looks like a mundane trojan.
— Vano 16:54, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:53, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
not notable INeverCry 01:18, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fan Pack? Do we need an article for this, or this info is better suited for the Guns N' Roses discography? (The latter I think) Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 23:32, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Delete per WP:G5 -- creation by banned sock account. — CactusWriter (talk) 14:39, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Subject fails to meet the requirements of WP:BIO, with his fame, such as it is, appearing to be inherited. The article was created by a serial sock puppet, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/AlexLevyOne and PROD template removed by same. JohnInDC (talk) 23:26, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy delete, WP:NOR, WP:SNOW, author admits that this is a philosophy he made up himself. NawlinWiki (talk) 21:30, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Seems to be a neologism from an internet forum.[2] Kaldari (talk) 20:54, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 05:34, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable. The contested deletion claims Kruse as a war hero, but his war experiences do not rise above the ordinary. The cited honours are citations for serving in particular campaigns, not for any extraordinarily meritorious actions. The reference to Kruseboka is apparently a private family history. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:27, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Nominator has withdrawn and there are no !votes for delete. My close reflects there now being no valid reason left to dicsuss deletion. Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 20:56, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Doesn't appear to meet the notability guideline for films (contested prod) – Arms & Hearts (talk) 19:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →TSU tp* 14:38, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Biscardi is a Bigfoot researcher who is arguably best known for his association with that Georgia Bigfoot hoax from 2008. There's not a whole lot of material available beyond that, so I would recommend deleting the article on WP:BLP grounds. I should note that a user recently gutted the page for "libelous, unsubstantiated material". I'm not commenting on the merits of that claim, but I do think the page is probably more trouble than it is worth. I first got involved with it a few years ago because I noticed that much of it was closely paraphrased. Many of the edits made to the page since that time have been disruptive, and I don't feel comfortable keeping it around, since it is a potential BLP minefield. Zagalejo^^^ 19:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →TSU tp* 06:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination of page for individual who appears to have little notability and appears to be have been created for self promotion. He is involved in the "pick-up" industry which is notorious for unsubstantiated promises of success for men with the opposite sex and for shameless self publicity in an attempt to make profits.
The referencing is extremely poor and no convincing material is available to suggest this page is notable.
Not only is the topic seemingly non-notable, but it also appears to exist only because of multiple editors and should be deleted as per WP:SOAP
--Paxti (talk) 18:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 06:52, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A seemingly completely arbitrary list of a couple random fictional spaceships. There is nothing to indicate why this comparison is notable enough to have its own article. We already have a List of fictional spacecraft as a general directory of fictional space ships, so this list of a few ships seems superfluous. In addition, the references that the information presented in this list came from is rather suspect as well, as two of them are not reliable sources, and one is just a streaming site for one of the shows. This was a contested PROD, so I brought it here. Rorshacma (talk) 19:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was merge to Cluedo. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:05, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Utterly WP:NN variant of Cluedo. A great example of why Wikipedia needs a speedy deletion criterion for articles about products that do not assert the product's notability or importance. Toddst1 (talk) 18:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:09, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ephemeral news piece. Geschichte (talk) 19:01, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Snow delete - this doesn't fit neatly into any CSD criteria, but has no hope of surviving AFD so I've called WP:SNOW SmartSE (talk) 21:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Zero indication of notability. I'm tempted to submit for speedy delete, but it's not a CLEAR hoax, so I figured this is the more appropriate route. JoelWhy? talk 18:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:12, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable London pub. Author has had a week to improve it and has done nothing. — Sgroupace (talk) 17:35, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am the creator of the article. I don't even know how to comment on this discussion. but i'm adding sources. Next time, if i do a new page, I will "userfy" it, now i know. Thanks for those who were more understanding and apologies to those who felt I was spamming/disobeying guidelines.Jackbeadle (talk) 09:23, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The Bushranger One ping only 17:46, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Despite a prod, three editors have made no effort to provide evidence. — Sgroupace (talk) 17:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →TSU tp* 06:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non notable amateur theatre club, passing mentions in two sources, but most of this stub is unsourced and I cannot find any substantial coverage as required by the notability guidelines. PROD declined. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:42, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to John Belushi and delete history per consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I don't really see anything here that makes her independently notable. Anything relevant to John Belushi can be mentioned there. —Chowbok ☠ 17:38, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to List of Puppet Master characters#Leech Woman. Consensus is to redirect (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It's a "character" from a B-horror film. The film warrants having its own article, but certainly not the individual puppets from the movie. This is an obvious delete based on zero notability/reliable sources. JoelWhy? talk 16:53, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →TSU tp* 06:23, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No context or Information ♠♥♣Shaun9876♠♥♣ Talk Email 16:40, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:21, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet WP:politician criteria for notability. This person is a leader of the city branch of the youth wing of a national political party in India. Dwaipayan (talk) 15:29, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No appearances for a fully-professional team and therefore non-notable Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 13:51, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:06, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This was split from Science 2.0 which was originally about the concept of science 2.0 but which at times was being changed to be about the Ion Publications website, etc called Science 2.0. Neither of these are very good articles and originally read, and still do to a large extent, as essays and original research. I can't find sufficient evidence that this website or Ion publications merits an article, and if you look at the Talk:Science 2.0 others were doubtful when they spun this off. Of course, deleting it will mean that the problem with what the subject is of Science 2.0 may continue. Dougweller (talk) 13:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was nomination withdrawn (non-admin closure). Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No appearances in a fully professional league and therefore fails WP:FOOTYN Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 13:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unsourced original research. Very difficult to verify due to vague article title; not clear if this is a current event (in which case probably not notable) or historical (in which case, when?) Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 13:28, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Definitive fail of WP:BLP1E. This article was longer, with lots of details about a crime for which this person was convicted and then exonerated. Even in the longer version it would have been 1E. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 13:09, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No references or indication of independent coverage to verify notability. JoelWhy? talk 13:07, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. -Scottywong| spill the beans _ 16:10, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This article doesn't meet the General Notability Guideline in that the subject has not received significant coverage (ie. more than trivial mentions) in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Indeed, the article uses almost exclusively primary sources directly affiliated with the subject (publications from the official D&D publisher, when it's not the D&D books themselves), while the only two independent sources are literally trivial mentions, with the name of the creature only mentionned once, in one sentence, without any significant discussion or analysis related to it. Obviously this D&D creature has no notability (as Wikipedia defines it) and should be deleted, since no one came up with any reliable source, despite the article being tagged for a lack of secondary sources for two years now.Folken de Fanel (talk) 12:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) →TSU tp* 06:22, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Tiny village, 15 houses, no sources, no evident notability. Rosside's main claim to fame seems to be a couple of local IP-vandals repeatedly adding nonsense to the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 12:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Consensus is stronger to merge than delete, but at this point the merge target doesn't exist. Let me know if this needs to be restored for the purpose of merging. -Scottywong| spout _ 16:14, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
WP:N Bazuz (talk) 11:47, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. A1, G1 Acroterion (talk) 11:52, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsensical article. TruPepitoM (talk) 11:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Could be Wiktionary, no consensus as to which article to redirect to, but obvious consensus the term does not belong in an encyclopedia (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:23, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This may go to Wikitionary or bust. TruPepitoM (talk) 11:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deleted per G12 by ErikHaugen (talk · contribs). Non-admin closure. —KuyaBriBriTalk 19:14, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Nonsensical article. TruPepitoM (talk) 11:21, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy deletion. WWGB (talk) 23:27, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Spam. Made this look like a website for them. TruPepitoM (talk) 11:20, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was G11 by Boing! said Zebedee. NAC by—S Marshall T/C 12:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC) [reply]
May look like spam or mainly no importance due to only one source also. TruPepitoM (talk) 11:09, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was speedy delete. G4. Also salted for three months considering how recent the last AfD is. T. Canens (talk) 14:05, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Clear puff piece for a local radio and TV host Bihco (talk) 10:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Consensus is to delete - not currently meeting notability (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Former BLP Prod, nominated by another user. While external sources have been provided, none are from reliable sources. Question over whether the individual meets the general notability guideline roleplayer 10:37, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Email from Cramup
|
---|
hi there,
I dont know if it can help, but we made a selection, including documentaries in tv channel, printed news paper and others, as follow below. thank you, Ali newspaper - a folha de sao paulo - pagina ilustrada http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/educacao/ult305u6753.shtml
via printed newspaper - http://paulatooths.sites.uol.com.br/ recommendations by other journalists - http://cramup.blogspot.co.uk/2012/05/palavras-de-persio-presotto.html via blogs/ colunms http://www.oocities.org/br/mandandoprarede/index.html http://www.oocities.org/br/mandandoprarede/colunistas.html http://www.oocities.org/br/mandandoprarede/quem_somos.html http://mandandoprarede.zip.net/arch2006-11-05_2006-11-11.html
http://ppresotto.blogspot.co.uk/2009/03/carling-cup-final-manchester-united-4-x.html http://ppresotto.blogspot.co.uk/2010/01/neve-na-inglaterra.html http://ppresotto.blogspot.co.uk/search?q=paula+tooths http://www.geocities.ws/mandandoprarede/colunas/artigo_em_destaque/aed_ar_024.html http://www.geocities.ws/mandandoprarede/colunas/artigo_em_destaque/aed_ar_046.html http://www.oocities.org/br/mandandoprarede/colunas/artigo_em_destaque/aed_ar_045.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paula_Tooths companies UK registration on: http://www.companies-uk.co.uk/bloom-up-therapy-soul-limited-06942823
Bloom Up! Therapy & Soul Ltd. - Developed by Paula Tooths Humphries & ptherapy bloomup.health.officelive.com bloomup.health.officelive.com/fitoterapia.aspx www.bloomup.co.uk|info@bloomup.co.uk. Copyright © 2008 - 2009 Bloom Up! Therapy & Soul Ltd. - Developed by Paula Tooths Humphries & ptherapy. Bloom Apothecary Magazine: Bloom 'Champi' - Indian Head Massage Kit Bloom Apothecary Magazine Worldwide Therapy United Kingdom T bloomapothecary.blogspot.com Bloom Apothecary Magazine (Portuguese) bloombr.blogspot.com/2009/03/outro-dia-descobri-que-site-foi.html ... Worldwide Therapy United Kingdom Tel: 0044 77 27 877 037. Copyright © 2008 - 2009 Bloom Up! Therapy & Soul Developed by Paula Tooths Humphries. Meet Paula Tooths-Guedes - SNHS Graduate Meet Paula Tooths-Guedest - SNHS Graduate. ... Paula is based in Bromley, Kent Paula has the following holistic therapy qualifications SNHS Dip. ... www.naturalhealthcourses.com
Tévez assina por R$ 80 milhões com o Manchester City ... 13/07/2009 22:45:00 Persio Presotto - Colaborou: Paula Tooths (Kent-ENG) Tamanho da fonte: ... [ MSM - Mídia Sem Média - Tévez assina por R$ 80 milhões com o ... - www.midiasemmedia.com.br ] paula tooths a Lugano in Ticino paula tooths Svizzera Swiss paula tooths Schweiz e Italia annuncio, Motore di ricerca [ paula tooths Lugano Annunci paula tooths - www.luganoannunci.ch ] com pista de 80 metros, hi- A pequena Sophia Victoria ... Paula Tooths. Conjunto. Reg,s. Tatiana, José e. Solange Correia. Walter e Mara. Patzina, Maria ... [ www.jornaldeperuibe.com.br ] precisava saber sobre você Por Paula Tooths Colaboradora do jornal A Hora Jornalista especializada em produção de cinema e tv em Londres em broadcasting co A [ paula jpg - www.ahoraonline.com.br ] Até descobrir a pequena Bromley, a jornalista paula tooths conheceu o mundo. ... Mandando Pra Rede (22) paula tooths (19) Copa das Confederações (15) Meet Paula Tooths-Guedest - SNHS Graduate. ... Paula is based in Bromley, Kent Paula has the following holistic therapy qualifications SNHS Dip. ... [ Meet Paula Tooths-Guedes - SNHS Graduate - www.naturalhealthcourses.com ]
|
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Contested PROD, by IP with no rationale given. Player has not played in a fully pro league therefore fails WP:NFOOTY & has not received significant media coverage & also fails WP:GNG. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 09:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 17:45, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article on an EU project suffering from the usual flaws. No independent sources, does not meet WP:GNG. Hence: delete. Guillaume2303 (talk) 09:13, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was Speedy Keep 2d as "nominations that are clearly an attempt to end an editing dispute through deletion, where dispute resolution is a more appropriate course". Admin should know better.... (non-admin closure) KTC (talk) 15:24, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This is a procedural nomination. I removed the section in American Pie (song) on the Madonna version of this song, and placed it into its own separate article, which already existed as a redirect. User:Richhoncho redirected it again, based upon WP:SONGCOVER. However, that page is only a Wikiproject suggestion, and cannot override the fact that this song obviously meets WP:GNG (over 30 references), and also meets WP:NMUSIC (the song was number one in over a dozen national charts, and went platinum or gold in half a dozen). As such, this should be kept as a standalone article, notwithstanding some Wikiproject's attempt to override sitewide consensus. Thus, the easiest way to find a clear decision community consensus is to open an AfD. Qwyrxian (talk) 08:53, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:44, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A Painter. No reliable and independent references in the article or to be found. Found some minor stuff at galleries that are showing/selling his works, but that is not independent. There are copyright problems with the text. Prod was contested on unknown grounds. Bgwhite (talk) 00:14, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus. After this discussion was relisted, one userfy !vote and three additional keep !votes were posted, and several new sources were presented in the discussion by User:Carrite to qualify the topic's notability, per WP:N and WP:GNG. Also, one user changed their !vote from weak delete to keep per the new sources presented in the discussion. However, the delete !votes with arguments that the topic fails WP:NGO and WP:ORG remain existent. Although consensus in this discussion is leaning toward a keep result, at this time there's no overall consensus here to close the discussion as such. Editors in this discussion have stated that the article requires expansion, better organization and the addition of sources, so the ((cleanup AfD)) template has been added to the article. (Non-administrator closure.) Northamerica1000(talk) 02:22, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A non-notable lobbying organization from Texas. Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 21:29, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Neither WP:GNG or WP:NFOOTBALL evidenced. joe deckertalk to me 17:38, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:NFOOTBALL. He plays in USL Premier Development League, an amateur league. Prod was contested on unknown grounds. Bgwhite (talk) 08:00, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep, nomination withdrawn. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 09:45, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't this list belong in the Gaziantep article? θvξrmagξ spellbook 07:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Hello. I am new here, but I have been active in Turkish language wikipedia for a few years. It is common practice to branch off list of famous natives of a city to its own article, like List of people from New York City to keep it from taking up space in the main city article. Therefore I say that this article must remain.--Basyigit (talk) 07:48, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Amateur football club which has never played in the FA Cup or the top ten levels of the English football league system, the yardstick of notability used by WP:FOOTY. Doesn't pass WP:GNG either - no significant coverage in indepedent reliable sources, pretty much everything in the article has been added by editors with a clear conflict of interest. Tagged for notability for around three years. -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —HueSatLum 17:47, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The subject of this article does not seem notable to me. I used NewsBank but found nothing. On Google News, I found one source, but that does not establish notability. →Στc. 06:48, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:45, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Seems like a vanity band, above garage level (won a 'battle of the bands') but not enough for an article. Tried searching, but no dirt. θvξrmagξ spellbook 06:43, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 02:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 02:59, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
This nomination is being placed on behalf of User:Ghazal Omid, who has previously identified as the subject of this article. The user is upset that incorrect information has been added to her page (which was removed once she called attention to it), and has requested that it either be fully protected (which is not an option) or deleted. You can see her request in in this edit. Per WP:BIODEL, "Discussions concerning biographical articles of relatively unknown, non-public figures, where the subject has requested deletion and there is no rough consensus, may be closed as delete." Omid does not understand how to use Wikipedia processes, so I have opened this on her behalf. I will review the article later and make my own recommendation, so please do not take this initial opening as my own vote for deletion. Qwyrxian (talk) 21:44, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If I may have a say here, this is Ghazal Omid. I ask of you to DO NOT KEEP:
I have been dealing with this article issue for since 2007 and has made frustrated several times. One for example is: in the past my religion was referred to as (S.H.I.T.E) this is merely a curse word used by media and many of the people who pretend to know Islam but they are not even willing to study for the sake of their public speaking. The world Shi'a in Arabic has a nasal [T] at the end. While in English people like to write it, in Arabic much like French we write alphabet that we don't pronounce. It also follows the same rules as French grammar does. Everything either is feminine or masculine. Therefore, we must have a Nasal T at the end so we know what sort of verb we use. But in English that T is not pronounced and the right way of writing Shi'a Islam is the way I just wrote here. Those who insist using what media uses, either don't know or don't want to know that this word is exactly the same as using an [N] word for black.
My second frustration is: I have been told that my books will be updated so people can see what sort of publication I have. It took me seven months to re-edit and copy right living in hell which now on Kindle and all other digital format as well in soft copy with two new ISBN. I have updated it so the typos used against in past can't be used as a mockery again. But you guys don't seem to have even noticed. I want you guys go to Amazon and talk a look at it. I don't want to submit anything because even the red cover is not correct. There are missing elements of that cover, which I have told you guys many times, but you keep insisting of keeping the inaccurate one.
Third: what is really the point of having an article about me when you write about me that she is a legal scholar. What is that mean? if you wish to correct it, I have a book coming up in 2014 called Islam 101. I am a Shi'a Islam scholar.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Rcsprinter (state) 20:49, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced list of schools/universities in Tacloban. Doesn't meet GNG. Hahc21 [TALK][CONTRIBS] 14:42, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was A7 by Materialscientist. NAC by—S Marshall T/C 12:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC) [reply]
Doesn't really assert notability, and I couldn't find any information about this person at all. θvξrmagξ spellbook 06:10, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Lack of notoriety and references to reliable sources. Subpar level of quality. NBMATT (talk) 20:38, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:01, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
No appearances in a fully professional league yet and thus fails WP:FOOTYN Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 03:58, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was SPEEDY DELETE. JIP | Talk 05:40, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Article is written like a newspaper article. (violates WP:NOTNEWS) jfd34 (talk) 03:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Consensus is to keep. Articles on the individual members have been deleted as per separate AFD, and redirected here (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:20, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
![]() | If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:((subst:spa|username)) ; suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)) ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)) . |
The result was redirect to Cimorelli. Consensus is the individual members are not separately notable - all 3 to be deleted/redirected (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:18, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Might look like a controversial nomination at first, but whilst the band Cimorelli are notable, Lisa, individually, is not. Google search returned no usable sources, news search only returned two results. Thus fails GNG. Basalisk inspect damage⁄berate 01:31, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are all discuss members of the Cimorelli group, and have no independent sources showing more than trivial coverage. NJ Wine (talk) 02:23, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. The community consensus seems to be to delete articles on events of this type DGG ( talk ) 02:57, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Not notable military accident. Tragic but with noone notable involved it Fails WP:AIRCRASH. ...William 02:32, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. I have had to read the arguments individually and carefully, and those without policy-based arguments are truly unhelpful on this one, and unfortunately easily discounted. One also has to include "REALITY". While the topic of Australian influence on UK music might be a good idea, this list does ot address that, nor is it useful nor indivcative of anything. It's therefore WP:LISTCRUFT, and unusable/unworkable. The consensus of the policy-based arguments is delete (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:35, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think this list is bordering on WP:LISTCRUFT. There's no indication of why it is notable and/or relevant. Till I Go Home (talk) 11:48, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was redirect to Shell Canada. The Bushranger One ping only 06:55, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Fails WP:CORP. Defunct company which was merged into Shell Canada. Although there is a number of media search results, these all are in the context of acquisition by Shell and no independent media coverage other than this one event. The acquisition should be mentioned in the Shell Canada article and, if necessary, it may be redirected there as a potential search term. Beagel (talk) 12:58, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. However, I would recommend trying to initiate a merge discussion first. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:00, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Unreferenced since 2007. It's essentially a topic of automated testing and does not require its own page. Merge content into Test automation. Walter Görlitz (talk) 13:41, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:58, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The article reads like a how-to essay, not an encyclopedia article. The lack of references does not help the cause. And Adoil Descended (talk) 01:55, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:57, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
She's had a number of bit parts; most notable role is a minor character in Hunger Games. Maybe she'll warrant a page in the near future, but I don't think she's quite there yet. JoelWhy (talk) 21:31, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The result was nomination withdrawn. Ron Ritzman (talk) 04:12, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
((cite web))
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(help)The result was delete. clear consensus DGG ( talk ) 02:54, 12 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Non-notable business, with non-notable personnel. WP:PUFFERY that clearly makes this promotional in nature. Wikipedia is not a business directory, it's an encyclopedia (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 00:37, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]