The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sorry, but we need more than a blithe "not delete" in order to not delete an article. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:14, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Losliya Mariyanesan[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:ANYBIO, the references provided are from 'celebrity' websites (with uncertain independent editorial oversight - more like fan sites) which only relate to her appearance as a contestant on an Indian reality television show. In addition Instagram is used as a reference when it is not an acceptable source. Statements such as "She is one of the leading News Anchors in Sri Lanka" have no alternative sources of verification and those provided clearly don't support that she is a 'leading news anchor'. Dan arndt (talk) 02:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sri Lanka-related deletion discussions. Dan arndt (talk) 02:25, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. Competing in a reality TV show != notability. Ravensfire (talk) 03:21, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No resources, just trivial mentions [1]Charmk (talk) 03:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Not Delete — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.75.56.154 (talk) 07:31, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please state your reason for your comment that the article not be deleted. Noting that consensus is not based on a tally of votes, but on reasonable, logical, policy-based arguments. Dan arndt (talk) 09:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not enough in-depth coverage from reliable secondary sources to meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:33, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.