The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Valley2city^‽ 17:07, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lu Renzi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced, seemingly not-notable BLP of a blog journalist in China. Verifiability will be difficult without expert help. Article is also up for deletion on the Chinese wikipedia.OliverTwisted ^(Talk) (Stuff) 06:24, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per the lack of reliable sources. A Google search for "Lu Renzi" returns 8 results, none of which are reliable sources, while a Google News Archive search for "Lu Renzi" returns nothing. A Google search for "卢壬子" returns mostly blogs, while a Google News Archive search for "卢壬子" returns no results. This blogger appears to fail WP:BIO. Cunard (talk) 01:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wao...Since the entry created by "Lhyx", I presume someone was trying to pull a fast one... It fails "WP:Too Many To List". TheAsianGURU (talk) 23:29, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. —Cunard (talk) 01:31, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete neither the person nor the blog have been discussed non-trivially in reliable sources. cab (talk) 04:03, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.