The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 10:23, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Luna Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PRODed for failing WP:NCORP in 2010 and dePRODed with comment deprodding record label of several notable artists which, in my view, does not address the concern of failing NCORP which takes precedence over any inherited notability from the notable artists that it may or may not have had on its roster at some point. From my research, I can't see that their connection with Grant Campbell or OvO is significant enough to even warrant a merge and, besides, there is no useful content to even merge anyway.

As far as I can tell, this is a very small record label based in Middlesbrough that does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH; I have not found multiple, independent, reliable sources discussing this company directly and in significant detail. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:41, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My WP:BEFORE search has only yielded self-published sources such as the company's own Twitter, some Resident Advisor promo, their Facebook and their Soundcloud. The only sources that provide more than a passing mention of the company are this review and this EP description. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:45, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:42, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete That this article has existed for over 13 years with no source other than the subjects own website is a negative mark against Wikipedia. Although having reviewed several articles on record labels, it almost seeems the majority of such articles lack any sources other than the record labels' own website.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:31, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 20:07, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.