- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Richard Menta. as a viable ATD as at the moment Menta is not up foe deletion. Star Mississippi 03:35, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- MP3 Newswire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
It would appear to me that this website - it is online when I checked as part of WP:BEFORE is still active - fails any number of notability tests, including but not limited to WP:WEBPAGE, and WP:NCORP for relation to its parent companies or subsidiaries, such as they may be.
I note that
- the deletion dicussion was closed 11 Aug 2005.
- the article was recreated on 28 September 2005
- Given its almost 20 years existence in WP:ARTICLESPACE, it would appear to me reasonable to review the 2005 deletion.
- a number of articles link here
- it would appear to me that it may quite possibly be a plausible Redirect to either an article of sections in an article - and if so which ones?
As always, please do prove me wrong about this!
Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: News media, Music, and Websites. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 10:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Results are all Newswires talking about mp3, nothing much for the site. This is all I got [1]. Oaktree b (talk) 15:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- or redirect to Richard Menta, but his article is about as sparse... Oaktree b (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, I had considered that and gave up, so I PRODded Menta, only to facepalm when Explicit the admin pointed out that I'd missed the PROD in the deletion logs. I might take his advice to take that to AfD, too. Until then, I decided it was a long shot and decided to try to G4 this. Instead of a side of WP:TROUT with a decline, reviewing admin Shirt58 decided to take time from their busy admin duties to come to AfD themself. A pleasant surprise! Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 15:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment These were cited in the last deletion discussion, but they're trivial [2], [3]. Oaktree b (talk) 15:22, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:23, 16 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.